Five practices. One team. One standard.
Engage one practice or all of them. Every engagement runs under the same secure development lifecycle, the same review standard and the same accountable lead.

Product engineering
Web applications, mobile apps, APIs, integrations and data platforms, designed from a threat model and delivered with the documentation a regulated buyer needs. We work in your repositories and your cloud accounts from day one.
| Delivery | Fixed-scope projects, embedded teams, or a fractional engineering lead |
|---|---|
| Stack | TypeScript, Go, Python, Rust, .NET, Swift and Kotlin; Postgres, event streaming, major clouds |
| Included | Threat model, architecture decision records, automated test suite, dependency and secret scanning in CI, release runbooks |
| Typical engagement | Three to five engineers for four to eighteen months |

Application security
Grey-box penetration testing with source access, secure code review, threat modeling, architecture review and adversarial exercises. On software we wrote and, more often, on software we did not.
- Grey-box web, API, mobile and cloud penetration tests with retest included
- Manual secure code review, targeted at authentication, authorization, crypto and data flow
- Threat modeling workshops that produce a living model, not a slide
- Red-team and assumed-breach exercises with your blue team in the loop
- Reports written for engineers, with a one-page summary written for the board

Platform engineering & operations
Infrastructure as code, Kubernetes and serverless platforms, identity and secrets management, observability and on-call. We run what we build, and we take over platforms others built when the controls need to be real.
- Landing zones and hardened baselines for AWS, Azure and GCP; on-premises and air-gapped environments
- Zero-trust access, secrets management and key rotation that does not need a calendar reminder
- Observability with alerting tuned to what you can act on
- 24×7 operations retainers with named engineers and published response targets

Compliance engineering
SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, StateRAMP and CMMC readiness treated as an engineering project: map the controls, automate the ones that can be automated, and make the evidence collect itself so the audit is a report, not a quarter of your year.
| Readiness | Gap assessment, control mapping, policy drafting against your actual architecture |
|---|---|
| Automation | Policy-as-code, continuous evidence collection, access reviews driven from your identity provider |
| Audit support | We sit in the room with your auditor and answer the technical questions |
| Ongoing | Quarterly control testing and drift reports on retainer |

Legacy modernization
Twenty-year-old systems that still run the business, moved to something your team can hire for, without a big-bang cutover and without losing the audit trail. We have taken COBOL, classic ASP, Access databases and more off life support.
- Strangler-pattern migrations with the legacy system as the oracle
- Data migration with reconciliation reports your finance team can sign
- Security review of the legacy estate first, because that is where the risk is
- Knowledge capture from the two people who still understand it
Not sure which practice you need?
Describe the problem. We will say which it is, and whether we are the right firm for it.